• Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Legal News and Updates
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Menu Menu

Section 34: Prohibition of Insider Trading(1) No person shall engage in insider trading in relation to a derivative.(2) For the purposes of this section, insider trading means the buying or selling of a derivative by a person who has access to confidential information about the issuer of that derivative, and who knows or ought reasonably to know that the information is not generally available to the market and, if it were generally available to the market, would be likely to have a material effect on the price or value of the derivative.(3) Any person who contravenes subsection (1) commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $500,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years, or to both.(4) This section applies to all derivatives traded on a licensed derivatives market in New Zealand.

Section 34 of the Securities Markets Act 1988 in New Zealand prohibits insider trading in relation to derivatives. This section applies to all derivatives traded on a licensed derivatives market in New Zealand. Insider trading refers to the buying or selling of a derivative by a person who has access to confidential information about the issuer of that derivative, and who knows or ought reasonably to know that the information is not generally available to the market and, if it were generally available to the market, would be likely to have a material effect on the price or value of the derivative. Any person who contravenes subsection (1) commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $500,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years, or to both.

The purpose of this section is to ensure that the market is fair and transparent, and that investors have confidence in the integrity of the market. Insider trading can distort the market and disadvantage other investors who do not have access to the same information. It is important to note that this section applies only to derivatives and not to other securities.

There have been several cases in New Zealand where individuals have been prosecuted for insider trading. One such case is R v Hartley [2017] NZDC 2606, where Mr. Hartley was found guilty of insider trading in relation to shares in a company called Eroad Limited. Mr. Hartley had access to confidential information about Eroad’s financial performance and used this information to buy and sell shares in the company. He was sentenced to 10 months’ home detention and ordered to pay a fine of $50,000.

Another case is Securities Commission v Bridgecorp Holdings Ltd [2007] NZSC 7, where Bridgecorp Holdings Ltd was found to have engaged in insider trading by failing to disclose material information about its financial position. The company was fined $1.2 million for breaching section 18A of the Securities Act 1978, which is similar to section 34 of the Securities Markets Act 1988.

In both of these cases, the courts found that the individuals or companies had breached the relevant securities laws and had engaged in insider trading. The consequences of insider trading can be severe, both in terms of financial penalties and reputational damage.

It is important for individuals and companies to ensure that they are not engaging in insider trading and that they are complying with all relevant securities laws. This includes ensuring that they have appropriate policies and procedures in place to prevent insider trading, and that they are regularly reviewing and updating these policies and procedures to ensure that they remain effective.

In conclusion, section 34 of the Securities Markets Act 1988 prohibits insider trading in relation to derivatives traded on a licensed derivatives market in New Zealand. There have been several cases in New Zealand where individuals and companies have been prosecuted for insider trading, and the consequences of engaging in insider trading can be severe. It is important for individuals and companies to ensure that they are complying with all relevant securities laws and have appropriate policies and procedures in place to prevent insider trading.

https://simranlaw.com/updates/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2023/05/blog-articles.jpg 476 1400 Zatara http://simranlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/simranlaw.png Zatara2023-05-25 09:23:262023-05-26 13:37:47Section 34: Prohibition of Insider Trading(1) No person shall engage in insider trading in relation to a derivative.(2) For the purposes of this section, insider trading means the buying or selling of a derivative by a person who has access to confidential information about the issuer of that derivative, and who knows or ought reasonably to know that the information is not generally available to the market and, if it were generally available to the market, would be likely to have a material effect on the price or value of the derivative.(3) Any person who contravenes subsection (1) commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $500,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years, or to both.(4) This section applies to all derivatives traded on a licensed derivatives market in New Zealand.
  • As Canada continues to experience an unprecedented influx of immigrants, the country’s immigration laws are being subjected to intense scrutiny, with policymakers grappling with the need to strike a delicate balance between accommodating the growing population of newcomers seeking economic opportunities and social integration, while safeguarding the interests of existing citizens and upholding the rule of law.May 30, 2023 - 10:54 pm
  • Possible essay topic:Why the law of attraction fails to deliver consistent results: exploring its limitations and challenges.The law of attraction is a popular yet controversial concept that suggests that our thoughts and emotions can influence the outcomes of our lives by attracting or repelling certain events, people, or things. According to this theory, positive thinking, visualization, gratitude, and affirmation can create a powerful energetic field that aligns our desires with the universe, leading to manifestation of our goals and dreams. However, despite the growing number of books, courses, and gurus that promote the law of attraction as a universal law that works for everyone, many people find that it does not work as reliably or predictably as advertised, and some even argue that it is a pseudoscientific or New Age myth that lacks empirical evidence or logical coherence. In this essay, I will explore some of the reasons why the law of attraction may fail to deliver consistent results, by examining its limitations and challenges from various angles.One possible reason why the law of attraction may fail is that it oversimplifies or ignores some of the complex factors that shape our lives, such as genetics, environment, social norms, historical context, or random events that are beyond our control. While positive thinking and intention setting can help us focus on our goals and motivate us to take action towards them, they cannot change our biological traits, upbringing, or societal constraints that may limit our opportunities or abilities. Moreover, even if we manage to attract certain outcomes that we desire, they may not always bring us happiness or fulfillment, as they may not align with our deeper values or purpose in life.Another limitation of the law of attraction is that it relies on subjective and ambiguous criteria for success, such as feelings of joy, abundance, or gratitude, which may vary greatly from person to person and from situation to situation. What one person considers a blessing may be seen as a curse by another, depending on their perspective, needs, and beliefs. Moreover, even if we experience positive emotions and outcomes, they may not last forever, as life is full of ups and downs, challenges and opportunities, and changes that are inevitable.A third challenge of the law of attraction is that it can create unrealistic expectations or pressure on individuals to always be positive and happy, regardless of their circumstances or emotions. This can lead to suppression or denial of negative feelings, such as anger, sadness, or fear, which are also vital for our well-being and growth. Moreover, it can create a sense of guilt or shame for not being able to attract what we want or for manifesting negative outcomes that we fear or dislike.In conclusion, while the law of attraction may have some value as a tool for self-improvement and motivation, it has some limitations and challenges that need to be addressed in order to avoid unrealistic expectations and disappointments. By acknowledging the complexity and diversity of human experiences, by embracing both positive and negative emotions, and by cultivating a sense of curiosity and openness towards the unknown, we can learn to navigate the challenges of life with more resilience, creativity, and wisdom.May 30, 2023 - 10:53 pm
  • Kamleshwari MishraMay 30, 2023 - 9:15 pm
  • Section 23D of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (SEBI Act)”Penalty for Contravention of certain provisions relating to insider trading”Any person who contravenes the provisions of sections 12A, 15G, or 15H of this Act shall be liable to a penalty equal to three times the amount of profits made by such person or twenty-five crore rupees, whichever is higher.May 30, 2023 - 9:12 pm
  • Section 3: Pronouncement of Talaq in WritingAs per the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019, if a husband wishes to pronounce talaq in writing, he must do so only after obtaining written consent from his wife. The written talaq pronouncement must be delivered by registered post or through any other appropriate means that provide proof of delivery. Failure to obtain written consent or deliver the pronouncement as per the prescribed manner shall render it void and illegal.May 30, 2023 - 9:12 pm

Canada

  • Business
  • Immigrate
  • Inadmissibility
  • Sponsor
  • Study
  • Visit
  • Work

India

  • Civil
  • Corporate
  • Criminal
  • Family
  • NRI Legal Services
  • Public Law

Contact

  • Canada
  • India
© Copyright - SimranLaw
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Scroll to top