Copyright issues with virtual concerts and holographic performances


Legal considerations that came to rise recently because of the ongoing COVID-19 disastrous pandemic around the globe due to which various artists and creators have started moving their show performance to be held virtually online for the public at large. This resulted in a huge deal, that there are things relating to the legal rights, which is often owned by different parties or artists, are under the surface of these holographic and virtual appearances for shows/ performances of these artists which also includes intellectual property rights (copy rights) in the underpinning audio recordings of musicians and musical compositions by them, patent protection in this emerging factor of technology, public persona rights of the many different artists, especially with the added point of legal right of the rights specifically of the deceased artist. Holographic performance makers require massive coordination and corporation with the real actual owners of the different rights with be manipulated or exploited. Throughout this new dimension world, litigation has thus far been relatively uncommon. Performers and organisation in this driven the market industry, that being said, should take into account as to what authorizations are deemed necessary in order to generate their holographic acts and who will own all the finished result property rights. If a broadcast performance contains music or a dramatic event, then Copyright Act pretty much covers protection for the artistic work, and a permit is required to distribute and showcase the content. A court order banning the video broadcast, the material being deleted from the provider’s website, legal demands for compensation, and attorney fees and other expenses which will result due to the not having an acceptable authorization.


Holographic performance is done through a modelling of human features gestures and actions which a basically based on previous representations captured and recorded before using computer-generated images as a replica. Holography is a method of technological innovation which helps to allow the recording and later reconstruction of a light field (which is typically the consequence of a source of light scattered off images if objects) whenever the original light colour field is no longer functional or present due to the absence of the original images of the objects.


The copyright protection act of Canada, which has since been passed in 1921 and considerably modified in 1988, 1997, and 2012, established the existing copyright protection act. Canada’s copyright protection under intellectual property rights governs the reasonably and legitimately enforceable rights and obligations under the rules and regulations of Canada for the protecting creative and artistic creations. Basically, copyright is established by the government and it is a protection that covers all literature, theatrical, creative and musical creations, as well as plays, sound recordings and patterns of communication. These numerous privileges provided include the right to freely perform the work; the right to replicate the performance, to create a copy of the creative work; probably the right to coordinate and synchronise a project with another production of the work, in particular a musical work.


Presently right now, in one of two different ways, holograms of deceased creative artist are sometimes made. The very first technique involves compiling and analysing an artist’s published and authenticated photographs and video recordings to create a whole new digital performance that has not really actually happened in the actual real world. This same technique used was to started creating the known holographic performance by the Tupac Shakur.

A mixture between freshly new film footage and archival content has been used in this second technique. The makers of the hologram begin with a performer who acts as the original showman ‘s body replacement double. The performer offers the creators freshly new footage by replicating previous performances of the original show man and this helps in creating new performances overflowing with the distinctive detailed body language, expressions and movements of the performer act. To create this virtual online composite, the whole video clip is consolidated with celebrity archival documentary footage.

The subsequent holographic performance sent to audiences is entitled to a bundle of privileges, protection and obligations that must be recognised and addressed, irrespective of any one of those two techniques was being used.


A number of categories of official original version creation “works” are safeguarded by the intellectual property rights copyright Act. Holograms might not have been specifically stated in the copyright law, and yet holograms share many characteristic features with kinds of projects or works named throughout the Act, undoubtedly. Archived photos and video documentation of footage as well as video recordings of a body replication replacement may incorporate the important components of holograms. Photos and videos in the Legislation are classified as works of art. Video clips and freshly new recordings are possible to arrive under the cinematographic work category, which would be a small subset of dramatic works, all of which have been specified and elaborated in the Statute of copyright. A hologram consists entirely of a selective collection of these component works which may act in accordance with the understanding of the term of a “compilation” under the legislation, which is itself entitled to copyrighted material protection. The legislation says that any work demonstrated by any process analogous to production design or cinematography, whether or not complemented by a background music, will include a cinematographic work.

Whenever a hologram is seemly called a cinematographic work or just about any type of dramatic work that work might just have substantial significance and consequence about the rights available and how certain of these rights should really be implemented and enforced about it.


The liberties in to the creation of any artist become the part of the collective category of rights termed to be known as ‘neighbouring rights’ (although this terminology is never used in the legislation). The assumption that their foundation is now to be found in the intellectual property copyright because they are said to be have their name derived from the roots of the neighbourhood copy right. In the extent of protections offered by them and including consideration to the subjects over which they connect, they differentiate from copyright. Performance privileges of sound records including communication transmissions signals are often mentioned under the neighbouring rights. Section 15 of the copyright Act extends copyright rights towards in the performances of all artists performing in Canada.

Although the copyright Act gives a specification by defining the work of a performer, as well as the intent and content of the legislation is specified, there really is no definition of the concept performer. This mere absence is also not likely to pose a problem in a conventional production of the performance, as the identification of the said performer or artists is usually evident. As technology blurs certain boundaries, nevertheless, the identification of the individual or entities could become troublesome and controversial.

The legislation relating copyright law specifies that every artist of the performer’s appearance is the first beneficiary means the real original owner of such copyright. The original owner of such an intellectual property rights here copy right may delegate or permit to some other person for its exclusive privileges or rights. But additional to that, the holographic performance work is recognized as a cinematic performance and the performer authorises permission of their performance to also be embodied in the holographic performance, then this Act expressly prohibits their copyright ownership exercise in the work performance reflected in that performance. Given the dynamic and challenging intertwining of rights relating copyright, it is crucial to address and solve this pre-emptively through contractual settlement every question as to about who really owns the copyright to the performance of the artist.

If the arrangements between the different copyright-holders does not precisely establish control ownership of their rights at work throughout the hologram, audiences may overlook their beloved late actors or performers’ which consists of experiencing and hearing ‘new’ & ‘original’ performances. For example, after showcased footage triggered a disagreement between rights-holders who were concerned about maintaining the value of the name of the deceased singer, Houston’s estate was able to delay her hologram tour. Although the parties concerned and involved finally settled the situation, several of the international tour dates for the upcoming shows were cancelled due to the ongoing COVID-19 disease outbreak.

It takes specific contractual arrangements between copyright holders to involve all possible partners and stakeholder so that effective producing takes place and touring artists and celebrity holograms be go without hurdles. Unless one of these owners, consider obtaining professional legal counsel from someone who can understand, safeguard and defend certain rights relating copyright law so that their genuine and realistic worth becomes plus remain more than just meaningless.


Most considerations of intellectual property rights come into effect to make absolutely sure that even an online event runs seamlessly smoothly and does not lead to unintended disastrous charges of infringement. It is very necessary to keep track of the those many original creative mind works which are being used, so to understand whether such an online technological performance production needs to be approved from the creator who is the real owner and as to evaluate to decide, who that owner might be, with that kind of artistic art being used as a content concurrently.

Every “original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic work, comes under the purview for copyright, according to the Copyright Act. These covered works which will include the original material music and choreography being done in the case of online performances, and perhaps even the software surrounding for underlying the performance and all the visual elements, such as the design of the avatar and the elements of the background. The event itself and any video of the performance are both being protected by copyright. The copy right Act of Canada specifies that, subject to some exceptions, the original author of a performance work is traditionally that the very first owner of the copyright throughout. For instance, since the artist generated the artwork in his capacity as an employee, the employer or company is usually that the very first owner of the copyright. Throughout the case of an online concert, the different underlying creations can indeed be owned by several individuals.

It is necessary to understand what rights are being infringed while creating any online show output performance and who can hold and manage the rights in the final piece of work. At the beginning, seeking and finding legal representation will lower the likelihood of future legal lawsuits.


It appears to be seen in the future if the departed celebrities will have hologram industry will be the future of entertainment or a new trend, but the use of technology continues to develop in this sector of industry, among many of the living celebs. Given this new trend going, in order to regulate and maintain future long-term value, either for themselves or their descendants, many surviving modern artists might recommend storing their own activities and pictures. Copyright rights are given to the creator of an original established creative work artist immediately after creation in Canada as well as in many other countries throughout the world, without registration being required.

Copyright registration will further help them to affirm and solidify those copyrights privileges, particularly when litigation appears possible. It is indeed popular to assume that copyright rights simply make the original creator entitle t to a monopoly over their creative work done and its financial profits. Originators of the creation, that being said, have the copyright right to another system of benefits that tends to come with becoming an author of an artistic original creation which is termed under as moral rights. The said principle regarding moral rights guarantees that there will complete protection of the dignity and real true purpose behind the creation of the author or artist. In addition to that, moral rights protection are important to defend the integrity and professional reputation name of the artist if, without their proper consent, the works they create are being defamed or altered for change.