Home
Practices
About
Careers
Contact

Criminal Lawyer Chandigarh High Court

WhatsApp

Call Us

Contact

1954

Dhirubha Devisingh Gohil vs The State Of Bombay.[With Connected ... on 11 October, 1954
Dhirubha Devisingh Gohil vs The State Of Bombay.[With Connected ... on 11 October, 1954
Dinabandhu Sahu vs Jadumoni Mangaraj And Others on 25 April, 1954
Dinabandhu Sahu vs Jadumoni Mangaraj And Others on 25 April, 1954
Duni Chand Rataria vs Bhuwalka Brothers Ltd on 3 December, 1954
Duni Chand Rataria vs Bhuwalka Brothers Ltd on 3 December, 1954
Durga Shankar Mehta vs Thakur Raghuraj Singh And Others on 19 May, 1954
Durga Shankar Mehta vs Thakur Raghuraj Singh And Others on 19 May, 1954
E. D. Sassoon And Company Ltd vs The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Bombay ... on 14 May, 1954
E. D. Sassoon And Company Ltd vs The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Bombay ... on 14 May, 1954

Newly Added Judgments

Kalooram Govindram vs Commissioner Of Incometax, Madhya ... on 5 April, 1965
T. S. Srinivasan vs Commissioner Of Income Tax, Madras on 29 November, 1965
Nawab Usmanali Khan vs Sagarmal on 26 February, 1965
Union Of India vs Sukumar Pyne on 6 October, 1965
State Of Kerala And Others vs Bhavani Tea Produce Co. Ltd on 7 October, 1965

Latest Case Analysis

Case Analysis: Durgadas Shirali vs Union of India and others
Case Analysis: State of Maharashtra vs Mohanlal Devichand Shah
Case Analysis: Pooran Singh and Another v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Case Analysis: The Cantonment Board, Ambala v. Pyarelal
Case Analysis: T. A. Krishnaswamy vs State of Madras

Latest Articles

Can a revision petition before the Punjab and Haryana High Court overturn a magistrate’s finding that a central labour inspector was not competent in a stone crushing minimum wage case?
Can the omission of the limited fine clause on a summons be grounds to quash the proceedings for a transport operator?
Should a lease holder challenge a magistrate's attachment of his vehicle for alleged shop rent arrears in Punjab and Haryana High Court?
Can a conviction for misbranding be overturned because the analyst’s report omitted the analytical protocols required by the statutory form?
Can the public examination order issued to senior bank officials be quashed on the ground that it compels self incriminating testimony before the Punjab and Haryana High Court?

Careers

About

Contact

Disclaimer

This website is only for general information. It does not constitute legal advice and must not be treated as solicitation or advertising. Viewing this site or contacting the firm through it does not create a lawyer–client relationship. All the cases and judgments mentioned on this website have been argued by Senior Advocate Simranjeet Singh Sidhu, also known as Senior Advocate SS Sidhu

Quick Links

Home
Practices
Articles
Analysis
About
Careers
Contact

Contact

Address: House Number 815, Sector 16-D, Chandigarh, 160015, India
Phone: Call
WhatsApp: WhatsApp

© SimranLaw